Who Is Yaser Abdel Said And What Did He Do?

The Ten Most Wanted on the FBI list is a list issued by the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigations that contains the most sought after people to be captured by the United States of America. The list is updated periodically, and currently on the list is Yaser Abdel Said.

Who Is Yaser Abdel Said?

Yaser Abdel Said is an Egyptian and according to the FBI a resident of the United States. He committed a heinous act, which is typical of those who are on the FBI’s Most Wanted List.

Said is wanted for murder. He is suspected of killing his two teenage daughters in Irving, Texas. In February 1987, Said married Patricia Owens. Apparently, the marriage was extremely abusive. In addition, it would appear, that Said was extremely controlling of his two daughters who were named Amina and Sarah. For example, Amina showed up at school with bruises on her body and a split lip. Amina was 18 at the time of her death, and Sarah was 17. Also, Said is alleged to have spied on his daughters in an attempt to further control their behavior and life. Said is also alleged to have made death threats to his daughters, especially to Amina.

Yaser Abdel Said is a Muslim who is claimed to adhere to strict traditional Muslim standards of behavior. He felt his daughters were not adhering to this criteria, and that is the reason he is alleged to have killed them.

Apparently, on January 1, 2008, Said lured his two daughters into his taxicab. Once they were in the cab, he allegedly shot them in the cab. As they were dying, Sarah called 911 to report that she’d been shot and that she was dying. The audio of the 911 call can be found on YouTube.

Said drove his cab, with his dying daughter’s inside, to a hotel and left it there where the taxi and the girls inside were discovered outside a hotel by another cab driver.

Yaser Abdel Said successful evaded the police and vanished. Although he is Egyptian, there is no record of him flying to Egypt to escape. There are reports that Said may be driving a cab in New York City, and apparently, he’s been seen driving a cab around Newark Aiport in New Jersey. Said was added to the FBI’s Most Wanted List on December 4, 2014. The award for information leading to his capture is $100,000.

Said is said to have black and gray hair and he’s going bald. He has brown eyes and is 6’2″ and 180 pounds. He is said to have a dark brown spot below his face on his neck. To conceal his identity, Said may have changed his physical features. He is said to frequent restaurants such as Denny’s and IHOP and he smokes cigarettes. Said has ties not only to Texas and New York and Egypt but also Canada. Said should be considered armed and dangerous even though he loves dogs, such as German Shepherds.

Are Honor Killings Happening in the USA

Honor killings are something that we hear a lot about in the news, but that are usually talked about in the context of Islamic countries. What a lot of people don’t realize is that they can, and do, happen closer to home. There have been several instances of honor killings in the United States, but they are not typically recorded as ‘honor killings’, but rather included with other murders. The police departments don’t have a record of honor killings, so when such tragic crimes happen, they are recorded as homicides.

Police departments are taught to look at killings as capital murders, rather than examining the motivations behind the crimes. This means that while the killers may still eventually be caught and end up behind bars, the root cause of the crimes is still not treated, and there is nothing being done to stop future crimes happening.

The people who commit honor killings are proud of what they do. They believe that they are doing the right thing. The Department of Justice estimates that there are between 23 and 27 honor killings performed each year in the United States. That’s around two a month, but there are no officially collected statistics to back that up. The culture in the USA is such that people are fearful of talking about crimes that Muslims commit towards other Muslims, and it is not something that people are confident addressing. There is a leaning towards being tolerant and politically correct, and many people, including law enforcement, are reluctant to step in when it comes to Muslim against Muslim crime, because of a fear of being seen as racist or not tolerant.

In the US, women and girls are at risk of being killed by their male relatives, in some cases with their own mothers aiding the crime, because of fear that the girls may bring shame upon their families. The crimes that the girls commit could be something like dating a non-Muslim, or not dressing modestly, or perhaps they would have dared to reject an arranged marriage.

Honor killings happen all over the world, and girls who become ‘too Westernized’ are at serious risk of them happening. If the government does not take measures to identify the scale of the issue, then it could well continue to spread across the USA. In 2016, according to lawyers, there were honor killings in Arizona, in Texas, and in many other parts of the United States. Muslim men molest, beat, shoot, stab or even run over their own children because they believe that they need to be punished for the crimes that they have committed and that they are doing the right thing to restore honor to their family name. These crimes happen all over the world, but the conversation focuses on the crimes in Pakistan or in Egypt, instead of the ones that are closer to home. It’s time that we look at the way that things are in our own country, instead of worrying about our neighbors.

Nations Where Honor Killings Still Occur

Honor killings have become a prominent topic of discussion in several nations around the world.

Several nations have started to illustrate a stricter stance against honor killings even if they hadn’t been as tough in the past. This article is going to dissect some of these nations where honor killings are prevalent.

It’s important to remember, honor killings take place in various nations (first and third world countries) but they are more common in third world nations. However, this read is going to focus on nations where it is far more widespread than normal.

1) India

The current rate is set at around 1000+ honor killings per year.

This is a staggering number in India even if it has a population of over one billion. The major concern for the nation of India has to do with the built-in caste system. With a strict adherence to this caste system and honor, it is easy for people to come out on the wrong end of these societal regulations.

While the courts in India are getting firm against honor killings, they still take place in various parts of India including major urban centers. It is also important to note men end up being victims of honor killing if they approach a woman in a higher caste.

2) Pakistan

Another nation in Southeast Asia would be Pakistan that has a large number of honor killings.

Just like India, Pakistan has around 1,000+ honor killings per year.

Pakistan has significant issues about what it is doing with its Islamic laws. These laws have been amended slowly, but there are still significant concerns about how they’re implemented. A lot of cases see lenient sentences in the nation of Pakistan.

Rural areas tend to have minimal follow-up when it comes to honor killings, and that is a concern cited by legal experts in Pakistan.

3) The Middle East

While this isn’t a nation, the Middle East can be tagged as a collective group when it comes to honor killings.

Some of the nations with relaxed laws for perpetrators include Iraq, Palestine, Iran, and Jordan. While these nations do make small amendments from time to time, the primary concern in these nations has to do with the implementation of these laws.

Most judges aren’t able to implement these laws, and that can lead to long-term issue about handling honor killings.

4) Europe

While Europe isn’t cited at the top as a continent with honor killings, there are many cases seen from time to time.

In nations such as Albania and Chechnya, there are examples of honor killings. While the remaining areas of Europe tend to have issues involving honor killings from immigrant populations who have brought over their understanding of honor.

European nations have strict legal standards for any form of honor killing and do set up programs to help potential victims of abuse and other related crimes.

These are the nations where honor killings still occur illustrating it is a problem that remains relevant to this day.

Are Honor Killings Legal in Jordan?

Honor killings are rampant in various parts of the world, and it’s important to understand how the legal systems are in these areas.

This read is going to emphasize Jordan in the MIddle East and how its legal system combats honor killings. The one question most people have about the legal system involves the legality of honor killings and how they are faced in society on a day-to-day basis.

Here is a deeper look into honor killings in Jordan and how they are viewed by the legal system.

What Is An Honor Killing?

Let’s begin with the definition of honor killing before looking at how it is handled in the nation of Jordan.

An honor killing is defined as a crime against a relative (often women) due to a perceived loss of honor due to the victim’s actions. The method of killing can vary depending on the situation and criminal committing the murder.

The reasons honor is lost can also vary depending on what society holds important such as adultery. The crime can be committed by one member of the family or multiple members of the family in unison.

Honor Killing Stats In Jordan

What is the ground reality in Jordan when it comes to honor killings against women?

The reports on the subject state at least 15-20 cases are reported of honor killings. In these cases, the method of killing can vary whether it’s assault, poisoning, and other forms of killing. There was an increase in 2016 that was cited by judicial authorities and lawyers.

Due to this upsurge, harsher sentencing was promoted, and newer deviants have been charged with longer sentences (up to 20 years in prison).

Additional changes are being made based on this assumption, and that is where the stats have started to come down over the past year or so.

Jordan’s Legal System

Let’s move onto the crux of the matter.

How does Jordan view honor killings and does it punish those who follow through with such actions under the pretense of losing honor?

In general, Jordan’s legal system does not promote honor killings and has come down on those who are performing such crimes. Article 340 of the Penal Code states a man can receive leniency if its proven his wife was committing adultery, but in most cases, the leniency is not as drastic. The same applies to article 98 of the penal code which states if a victim commits a dangerous act, the defendant can receive a lenient penalty.

Over time, Jordan’s judicial system has been working on becoming stricter on honor killings, and the Parliament has initiated harsher sentencing standards.

This will continue moving forward and is something taken seriously in the nation of Jordan.

In the end, Jordan does not allow honor killings but does have lenient sentences in some cases one wouldn’t see in other parts of the world (i.e. committing adultery). This is important to note when it comes to the nuances of Jordan’s legal system.

What You Should Know About The Honor Killing Of Samaira Nazir

Samaira Nazir happened to be the very brightest in the family and was well-educated and articulate woman who graduated from a well-known university before taking up directorship in the families’ recruitment business.

Salman Mohammed, a man desperate to get away from Afghanistan was smuggled into the U.K. in a lorry. He made his living from the sale of phone-cards from his market stall.

When Samaira and Salman met they soon fell-in-love which was followed by many years of a secret love affair. They eventually defied Samaira’s family and announced their plans to get married. This unfortunately proved to be an extremely fatal move and resulted in the death of Samaira in what is known as an “honour killing.” Azhar Nazir the brother of Samiara is the same person who introduced the couple and 5 years later would be the one to kill his own sister.

In 2006, Nazir and his cousin only 17 at the time, Imran Mohammed (real name Kashif Rana) were sentenced to life in prison in association to the barbaric and horrific murder of 25 year old Samaira Nazir.

On the 23 April 2005, Salman Mohammed and Samaira Nazir tried to arrange a meeting with Ishrad Begum, Samaira’s mother at one of their relative’s home, but she denied them. Instead Samaira was ordered to her family home which was based in Southhall, West London. When she arrived her father 61 years of age also named Azhar, her cousin and her brother attacked the woman. They held her down and then cut her throat in 3 different places before stabbing her 18 times.

Her screams for help alerted a neighbor who banged on the families front door. The father emerged and explained to the concerned neighbor that his daughter was having a type of fit. This was followed by another neighbor that noticed a blood-soaked arm that belonged to Samaira emerging out of the door before they dragged her back inside.

As they listened to the woman begging and pleading for help, her very last words were for her mother was she stated: “You are not my mother anymore.” Later on police discovered trails of blood throughout the home and the body of Samaira in the home’s hallway. As the police led Nazir away he shouted “There had been a problem with my sister.” After which he stated “She does not wish to have an arranged marriage and we only allow marriage within the family.”

In court Mohammed and Nazir denied the murder, Nazir claimed that he was not even in the room, while Mohammed made a claim that the woman was a victim to a form of black magic. The men were both convicted of the murder.

After the incident Samaira’s father ran away to Pakistan once he had been charged. The family claims that he has died, but police are not convinced and are still in the process of trying to find him. The charges against the woman’s mother were at a later stage dropped.

Key Details About The Honor Killing of Anooshe Sediq Ghulam

Norway was the scene of this honor killing, and it was followed with great attention due to how unique the case was in the nation.

The victim was a young woman named Anooshe Sediq Ghulam.

The honor killing took place in May 2002 and was reported in the media for the next few weeks.

Who Was Anooshe Sediq Ghulam?

She was an Afghan woman who was 22-years-old at the time of her death.

Anooshe Sediq Ghulam lived with her husband in Norway and was an ethnic Uzbek. She had grown up in Mazhar-i-Sharif before being married off to a man named Nasruddin Shamsi. According to Annoshe, she was married to Nasruddin at the age of 13.

However, their official documents state she was married to him at the age of 15/16. They arrived in Norway as asylum seekers in 1999. Due to the situation in her homeland, she was able to receive permanent stay orders from the Norwegian government.

Day of Honor Killing

Her husband, Nasruddin Shamsi first came on the police’s radar when he was charged with domestic violence after his wife called in.

He was convicted for his abuse against Anooshe at the time (summer of 2000) and had to spend time in prison for his actions. In the meantime, Anooshe started to spend time at a local refuge center. The husband later found out about where she was and targeted her as he got out of prison.

She was killed by her husband outside the police station in Kristiansund.

Reason for Honor Killing

In general, Nasruddin was unhappy about his married life and didn’t take kindly to the state meddling with his private affairs (i.e. domestic violence case). He wasn’t able to speak fluent English, and this caused him trouble at the time. After he had realized the marriage wasn’t going anywhere and he had been charged with domestic violence, he made a plan to kill Anooshe when they came for the custody battle.

He was arrested on the spot for his actions and later stated the plan was to only kill himself rather than his wife.

The children were sent to a foster home in case his family decided to kidnap them later on.

Court Case For Her Husband

What about the court case for Nasruddin Shamsi after he was arrested?

The man from Afghanistan was charged with murder and received an 18-year sentence in a Norwegian prison. The case took place over a span of 20 days before coming to a conclusion with the listed verdict.

As for the children, they are in a foster home and remained within the Norwegian system. Anooshe’s family were given free visas to come to Norway for her funeral but couldn’t make it due to potential threats from Shamsi’s family in Afghanistan.

While this wasn’t a classic case of honor killing, it still fit the guidelines according to the judicial system.

What You Should Know about The Honor Killing Of Ghazala Kahn

A Danish woman by the name of Ghazala Khan born on 29 October 1986 and died on the 23 September 2005 was killed by one of her brother’s in Denmark because she had made the decision to marry against the wishes of her family. This murder was first ordered by Ghazala’s father in order to save their family honour, which made this arrangement a so-called Honour Killing.

The Background

Three years before the murder, Ghazala was already involved in an “intimate” relationship with Emal Khan, before they were married. Ghazala at the time feared the reaction of her family and made an intention that she would like to keep their relationship a secret. She later revealed these feelings to her mom. She became outraged and reacted by beating her along with Akhtar Abbas her older sibling, who was the same person who would go onto shoot her.

Emal Khan reported that after this incident, they locked Ghazala in their home and she was “isolated” from her other family members, all of these family members refused to eat with her or speak to her. On the 5th September in 2005, Ghazala escaped and went to live with her future husband Emal. Up until the day of her murder the couple lived with a number of friends all over Denmark. They went to the police several times asking for protection. Unfortunately the pleas for help were denied. Later on the 21 September, Ghazala and Emal were married in Middelfart a small Danish town at the Registry Office.

About The Attack

Only 2 days after they were married, her family pretended that they would like to meet with the couple for reconciliation. They convinced the newlyweds to meet them at a railway-station in the area of Slagelse. This was the location that Akhtar Abbas shot Emal and Ghazala Khan. Ghazala was instantly killed, while Emal sustained 2 shots to his abdomen. He survived the gunshot wounds after a long operation.

Court Proceedings

On 15th May 2006, a case against all the people that were involved in this murder began. A total of nine individuals were put on trial. There were never any doubts that the brother was convicted for murder, as he was the person that used a gun on her, which was proven from surveillance pictures taken from the nearby railway-station.

Cases brought forward against the other family members which included Ghazalas aunt, other brother and father were a lot more controversial as it was more complex to prove their involvement. However, all 9 were convicted for the murder of Ghazala khan and received harsh sentences in regards to the Danish standard.

In Denmark, the sentencing can include anything from 5 to 16 years in a prison or prison-for-life when you are found to be guilty in association to murder. The man who shot Ghazala received a 16 year prison sentence while her father received a life sentence in prison. The aunt who was believed to lure the couple to Slagelse and was the same person to reveal to the other family members where Ghazala was received a 14 year prison sentence. The remainder of accused, which are all relatives or friends of the family, all received sentences in prison ranging from 8 to 16 years.

Details Regarding The Honor Killing Of Sadia Sheikh

Four members of the Pakistani family who honor-killed their daughter and sister on the 22nd October 2007 were sentenced to prison by a Belgian court in Belgium’s first honor-killing trial. The jury of 5 women and 7 men found all four family members guilty of shooting and killing Sadia Sheikh and the judge sentenced Tarik Mahmood Sheikh, her 61-year-old father to 25 years in prison, Zahida Parveen Sariya, her 59-year-old mother to 20 years, Mudusar Sheikh, her 27-year-old brother to 15 years and Sariya Sheikh, her 22-year-old sister to five years in prison.

Family lawyers said after the trial that Mudusar, who confessed to shooting his sister three times, was given a lesser sentence than his father and mother as they were the ones considered to have ordered the honor-killing of Sadia. Prosecutors wanted life sentences for the father, mother, and son and 20 to 30 years in prison for Sariya.

When questioned Mudusar admitted that the murder was premeditated and had been planned for a long time, but denied that the rest of the family were to blame.
All four family members stood accused of aiding and abetting the wrongful death of Sadia Sheikh which took place at her family home when the law student visited them in the hopes of patching up their differences.

When her shopkeeper parents started to arrange an unwanted marriage between herself and a cousin from Pakistan whom she had never met, Sadia decided to leave home to study in Belgium. There she was assisted by teachers and fellow students and attended meetings at a center for Victims of Domestic Violence where she drew up a will because she felt threatened by her family. She met and moved in with a Belgian named Jean who was the same age as she, but nonetheless made plans to visit her family to make peace with them on the day she was killed.

Her father, mother, and sister denied any involvement in the shooting saying that Mudusar had killed his sister because he was in a fit of rage. They are also facing additional charges for “attempting to arrange a marriage”. Rights groups were also involved in the trial pleading for gender equality as part of the civil suit.

The honor-killing of Sadia Sheikh, although the first in Belgium, seems to be only the tip of an iceberg as it emerged from interviews with professionals for the weekly magazine Knack that thousands of women and girls in Belgium deal with the fear of honor-revenge in the broad sense, as well as a complex series of other violence related problems which nothing is being done about.

Maybe the death of Sadia Sheikh will have a bearing on how these issues are dealt with in Belgium going forward to try and prevent girls who defy their families by refusing to partake in arranged marriages from being the victims of honor-killings. This highly publisized trial could help to bring more awareness to the very real threat to young girls and older women who are denied the basic human right of choosing for themselves who they want to spend their lives with.

History of Honor Killings

Honor killings, where victims are murdered by their relatives due to a loss of honor or perceived loss of honor, has been around for centuries. While some might feel this is a recent phenomenon, it has been around for a while and has been passed down over the years. The history of honor killings go all the way back to the Qing Dynasty in China and Ancient Rome.

Ancient Rome

In Ancient Rome, a senior male or “pater familias” was allowed to kill a sexually active woman in the house. It could be a sexually active daughter or an adulterous wife depending on the situation. At the time, it was also common for the assumption of rape victims being associated with honor killings.

In the eyes of Ancient Romans, a woman who had been violated would not be able to restore her honor and therefore had to be killed.

While Ancient Romans didn’t exercise this right as often, it was still allowed, and that’s where honor killings began.

Qing Dynasty

With the Qing Dynasty, father and husbands were given the right to kill a woman that had been promiscuous.

It was seen as a way to restore honor to the family name.

The rulers at the time didn’t care about the consequences that came with such actions and promoted them. It was also an extension of their treatment towards women in the kingdom. This was seen as a way of life, and it was something that had been given importance.

In fact, this is one of the reasons why the Qing Dynasty is spoken of as being one of the most ruthless of its time and perhaps overall.

Modern Era

What about the modern era?

While the Romans and Chinese are not focused on a perceived loss of honor, it has been passed on in the regions of the Middle East or Southeast Asia.

Honor killings are still seen on a regular basis in these areas and are now as heavily penalized as they are in the West. While changes are being made, most of the honor killings are still based around the same idea of loss honor by a woman of the household.

Many nations such as Pakistan continue to illustrate an inability to punish those who are accused of honor killing as things get brushed under the carpet in rural areas.

This is the history of honor killings and why it is prevalent in this day and age. Over time, a lot of work has been done in Western nations to help those who are trapped in such situations. Many countries are starting to move away from the concept of honor killing and have made amendments to their laws.

However, it’s important to note the most important step is the implementation of these laws where things are still not as focused as they should be.

Can Forced Suicide Be Considered To Be An Honor Killing?

Forced suicide is where a person is persuaded or pressured into killing themselves. The person is either brainwashed into committing the act or they are provided with circumstances that leave them with little option but to commit suicide such as the threat of or act of torture, imprisonment or death to themselves, family members or other loved ones.

This practice has it’s earliest roots in Greece and Rome where it was considered to be an honor killing, especially in cases where noblemen or women were given the option when being faced with a death sentence. A death sentence was often accompanied by the seizure of assets and property by the government. By opting to commit suicide, a person could pass ownership to their family.

China and other Asian countries have also practiced forced suicide as form of honor killing for centuries. Sati is one of the most common means where women will throw themselves on their husband’s funeral pyre after his death. However, it is uncertain whether this can be classified as forced suicide as coercion is not always prominent.

Seppuku in Japanese culture allows for a samurai to commit suicide rather than face the dishonor or cause dishonor to his Daimyo (master) by being put to death. This practice has been extended to force soldiers into committing suicide on the battlefield in order to kill as many of their enemy in the process.

In modern times, forced suicide is mainly aimed at women in certain cultures, especially in some Middle Eastern countries, or with Middle Eastern immigrants where they are coerced into killing themselves. Normally a threat to friends or family is used as a means to force the woman into suicide rather than cause harm, imprisonment or even death to a loved one.

This can be considered to be a form of honor killing as the woman gains honor by saving her family. However, these cases are highly controversial and are currently under investigation by the U.N., especially in the Kurdish territory of Turkey.

While the Turkish Government is taking action to investigate and prevent these type of killings by promoting campaigns against violence and abuse of women, the acts are still quite common. There is a great push for every case of suicide to be investigated to ensure that it was not murder.

There are some cases where the forced suicide may also be suspicious meaning that a murder of a woman may be disguised as suicide. This happens mainly where coercion fails to force the woman to take their own lives. It is also controversial as to whether this type of suicide can be considered to be honorable.

In Western society where committing suicide is often viewed as a sign of weakness, honorable killings are still practiced although they are much more rare. In some situations, it may be considered to be more honorable to take one’s own life than continue to harm or live with the dishonor that a person has brought to their family.